Moray Allan <mo...@sermisy.org> writes: > On 2013-02-26 00:05, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: >> I would prefer the following: Before the conference only pro and corp >> attendees can buy a better room. > > We were trying to separate those things. Perhaps your proposal could > be restated as "only attendees not applying for accommodation/food > sponsorship"?
Yes that's what I meant. We just had a longish discussion on IRC (#debconf-sponsors) and cleared up some misunderstandings about this. We need to clarify what the separation of pro/corp fee and food/accomodation really means. In other words which combinations that we want to allow. I was under the impression that the corporate fee always also included a part for the general conference costs and that we don't want to drop that. And that if you want to attend for free and aren't sponsored you have to organize your own accomodation and food and can't just buy that on a daily basis from debconf. But others on IRC pointed out that the professional fee was originally only meant to cover food and accommodation costs. So with the split into food/accomodation costs and conference fee, the additional professional fee would become 0.-. The question is now if we should still offer two types of registration fees or if we only want to offer one. We did not reach a conclusion about this beside that the fee(s) should have a label and price which makes it easy to put this through on company expenses. Gaudenz -- Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better. ~ Samuel Beckett ~ _______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
