On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 02:43:26PM +0100, Didier Raboud wrote: > That said, I must say I'm really disappointed that the local team members > have to face such untrust. It's really hard to acknowledge and accept > that we did these investigation one year ago [0], that we are making them > better over time, and yet get mails from other team members that write in > November 2012 that it is impossible to evaluate if talk rooms and hacklabs > and Internet are viable in LeCamp.
> Please try to trust us, at least a little; that would help pushing that > project forward, as a team. I believe the relevant expressions here are: - Trust, but verify - With many eyeballs, all bugs are shallow There is no magic checklist that, by ticking all the boxes, guarantees a successful DebConf. When people press for further details about the venue, it's above all because they worry that we have not done a good job of expressing to you as the local team what the real requirements are for a successful DebConf. It's in no way a criticism of your ability to implement the requirements you *know* about, but a lingering fear that there will be problems because of *hidden* requirements. Please help the team help you, by being transparent and public about these things. Also, please remember that this is a Debian conference, and that it's in our nature to second-guess every decision anyone ever makes... and try to bear your fellow compulsive geeks with a bit of grace and humor. ;) -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
