We most certainly can, and looking at this whole "conversation" here, SHOULD hold a meeting regarding all of this.
I would also like to mention that, the reduction of the sponsorship packages wasn't ONLY because of the local sponsors not being able to reach higher sponsor levels, but MOSTLY because of the reasons i mentioned in my previous mail. Velimir On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 10:07 PM, Damyan Ivanov <d...@debian.org> wrote: > -=| Velimir Iveljic, Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 08:40:33PM +0100 |=- > > I don't think this will be necessary, as we agreed to not have 2 types of > > sponsorship (meaning local and global). > > One sponsorship type should be enough. > > Okay. > > Still, the thresholds and the rearrangement proposed by Holger are > worth a meeting, I think. > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) > > iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJNG6MVAAoJEOQbTFV/DYC+AX4QAJZeW+svX2tSgWIwe5Y+6RAZ > yW4n5OzhtXr05x4axfzMepk/mQj8bH46yXDTt2O0686eoWhxG35LO9fL+sCsV6Lw > ksxwYy1zOzz2I0Ht6PtPE2bvZfWFZv7Fv4rH9b+3LxHhZgeaxPHXCm7vaaemV9/a > T5iHrpDLjrCgC2XcusBbgm6RXuJDq5IgC8lmjETTgmjzmW2VVcdbUTjqrxkeTBy0 > AYoUhpWJl88wlA7vq5wFsPC/aAnBm5dPGY2fw0IFOv1xWIi7S4V7HDxBp/dNL50Y > XInFbzOJa+GiyurX7A2e/U823yjgav9mocOM6HiJepMmRlFS2wvb0e7iOCXgG7ym > EAJOR3CQbfZkyvVggmc0ua1ehG3bXbnNz3xmEmLrVaBuVn9LaWkaRIk76Eg1uYjp > pFIRSI7CCT3z+2D2GQZJfpAhRcZJFyAqkUPlO9n0jVVUYFPlzZWh2SBb8CUcFrR8 > fU3GTg9DuaHx7uc9jzAh6f/sKqFtxyXouCPnmEaqbDMuZxFHplOWitTj0XmrnmQw > Xv/wx1m7nbF6eUsKddcUvFzqQDF0aq5C7IDRCx8H0dTiP9Xjd9A6eNpVGr7lXWem > 5jEbr5+0G9kZpg1gFjHIC0CFEiaWLCgZFyho316U7h2Zp6UV5oUR2IbL0RX+nd/C > r44LuuZTVyOr1PHnS3wL > =DnxZ > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > _______________________________________________ > Debconf-team mailing list > Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org > http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team > >
_______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
