Hi, On Freitag, 17. Dezember 2010, Brian Gupta wrote: > Looking at it from a sponsor's point of view, raising the donation > threshold would raise questions, where lowering it really won't, but > might raise questions later if we decide we need to raise them again.
which will likely happen, when we get less government sponsorship next time.
> I also think that repeat sponsors are prepared to sponsor to the same
> "level" and will just pay what that price is. So if a bronze sponsor
> from 2010 paid $2k, charging any less would leave money on the table.
> Basically I think consistency and predictability to sponsors is a good
> thing.
I tend to agree with this.
I _assume_ the low(er) amounts are due to two things: a.) the government
sponsorship this year and b.) to make it "easier" for local companies to
reach higher sponsor levels.
(Assuming this is right) we _could_ probably introduce different levels for
local companies, but I'm not sure this is a good idea.
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
