On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 2:34 PM, Brian Gupta <brian.gu...@brandorr.com> wrote: > Looking at it from a sponsor's point of view, raising the donation > threshold would raise questions, where lowering it really won't, but > might raise questions later if we decide we need to raise them again. > I also think that repeat sponsors are prepared to sponsor to the same > "level" and will just pay what that price is. So if a bronze sponsor > from 2010 paid $2k, charging any less would leave money on the table. > Basically I think consistency and predictability to sponsors is a good > thing. Obviously the fact that we change currencies for the thresholds > doesn't help, but trying our best to do so is all that really can be > expected. > > Thoughts?
that is true maybe for the higher levels of the sponsorship scale. Bronze level, they are people quite close to the project and they just want to help make the conference happen. I personally feel asking them to accommodate slightly higher and lower brackets depending on the site it will be considered as a good faith move. OTOH, "leaving money on the table" is a good argument. I just don't want to "leave recurring sponsors". We did have problem with the NYC jacked up brackets last year and we justified them with the higher level of exposure to their brands due to a conference in NYC. P. _______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
