-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 07/26/2006 06:11 AM, Fabian Fagerholm wrote: [...]
> Now, back to the original question of pending tasks. > > Felipe suggested [0] two things (good suggestions IMO): to ask Andreas > for more items to go on the list, and to ask Andreas for help in > carrying out the tasks themselves. I think it's quite reasonable -- > wise, even -- of Andreas not to involve himself with the latter, given > the current circumstances. > > [0] http://lists.debconf.org/lurker/message/20060725.125603.4d2432b8.en.html In fact, I was expecting that *maybe* Andreas would find a way to work for DebConf once again, that *maybe* starting helping to finish DC6 tasks he would find his way back into DebConf stuff. :-) > As for assembling the list: what makes you think Andreas has the list I > asked for? He doesn't. It's distributed over several persons as it > should be when a team effort is running. The partial one he does have, I > have already discussed with him both face-to-face during DebConf6 as > well as briefly over the phone. My reason for asking publicly was > precisely that different people may have different tasks pending, and > are now in uncertainty about what to do with them. This is about getting > closure for DebConf6, not hearing yet again the cackle about > disappointment and whose fault it is that we are in the current > situation. > > So I repeat the questions: > > I'd like to know what tasks people still have pending from DebConf6, and > what you all think we should do about them. I still have to sent to you (Fabian) a report about helping the Orga Team for the first time. (I had problems sending mail to you, but it is off-topic to the list). > Are there any good reasons not to drop all these tasks and consider > DebConf6 an abandoned project? Yes. As good reasons I could think of: - All the DebConf6 attendees; - the future DebConfs - our sponsors > I'll add another one that comes to mind now: > What is the minimal set of tasks that must be done to bring DebConf6 to > a (legal) conclusion? I really think that we need some input from Gunnar on all that subjects/matters. :) Kind regards, - -- Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) "Debian. Freedom to code. Code to freedom!" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Debian - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEx3zQCjAO0JDlykYRAn8TAJ912zTSFiPQnigNhQoBy+/WrdSuBgCgt+3u D6TxS8qWlucHwdUn4zqwqkA= =cBw4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
