On Thu, 2006-07-27 at 14:23 +0300, Fabian Fagerholm wrote: > Then came the delegation discussions, the delegation, the withdrawal... > So I'm uncertain about what the current team thinks the report should > achieve and how. (Aside from the uncertainty regarding the current > composition of the team.) > > Then there are questions of content, as well. If the report should > highlight major aspects of the event, should we explore the negative > themes as well as the positive ones? DebConf6 has already gotten much > more attention than DebConf5 had at this point, and that background is > what the Final Report is leaning on. > > I could go on, but I think the above captures the essence of the > uncertainty.
Does anyone have any comments? Do you need more time to think this over? -- Fabian Fagerholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
