On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 07:18:39PM -0400, Chris Knadle wrote: > On Monday 16 August 2010 16:11:52 Aaron M. Ucko wrote: > > Chris Knadle <chris-deb...@coredump.us> writes: > > > > Hi, Chris! I'm staying out of the policy discussion, but have some > > technical comments on photo IDs. > > > > > I don't agree with the latter reason, as I think this should be a > > > personal choice and I don't think PhotoIDs are "wrong", and I'm > > > annoyed that such a choice is being made for me by the author of the > > > tool rather than simply giving a warning. > > > > Agreed, though the great thing about free software is that you don't > > have to be limited by the original author's vision. ;-) > > I could theoretically fix the code to change it the way I like for /me/, but > if I want to do this for others that gets a bit more complicated. I suppose > I > could discuss this with the Debian Qt/KDE Maintainers for starters, which is > who is listed as maintaining the kleopatra package. >
No, you should discuss this better at upstream :) Get the changes there and about 6 months later in the worst case, you have it in Debian. _______________________________________________ Debconf-discuss mailing list Debconf-discuss@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-discuss
