I absolutely agree that the LDAP authentication should not be included for
1.1, however if you can include the infrastructure changes that will make
it easier to patch in, I'd much appreciate it :-)

I've posted the changes again this week, but mostly as descriptions and
code, not specifically patches. If you're too time-crunched for my
ramblings, I'll get you a diff -c, it's no trouble!

Aaron


On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, Roel Rozendaal - IC&S wrote:

> well that would seem sensible from a pure version-number point of view
> but the current cvs has no real new developments other than separate
> authentication and QUOTA support. So this 1.1 release is more like a
> 1.0a bugfix release or however you would like to call it :-).
>
> Our goal for the moment is to release (on _real_ short notice) a dbmail
> version that is (1) compiles at once and (2) has working POP and IMAP
> daemons. I prefer (by far) not yet implementing LDAP-authentication and
> QUOTA for a stable release. As said before on this list, the
> segfaulting pop daemon and compile-time errors are show-stoppers and we
> really hate it that people get disappointed about dbmail because of
> this..
>
>
> Ben Kochie heeft op dinsdag, 4 feb 2003 om 17:37 (Europe/Amsterdam) het
> volgende geschreven:
>
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > wouldn't it be better to release CVS current as 1.1rc1, and let us test
> > it.  this way we don't run into the silly things that happened to 1.0
> > :)
> >
> > - -ben
> >
> >  "Unix is user friendly, Its just picky about its friends."
> >
> > On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, Roel Rozendaal - IC&S wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> from our point of view, dbmail 1.1 is needed as soon as possible since
> >> the 1.0 release does not compile straight away and suffers from severe
> >> pop-bugs. These problems seem to be solved now; we are planning to
> >> release the current CVS as dbmail 1.1 next thursday. I would ask you
> >> all for patches are available but have not yet been included in cvs.
> >> Some key points from the top of my head:
> >>
> >> * automake
> >>    anyone has some working automake/autoconf patches for current CVS?
> >> * separate authentication (LDAP)
> >>    has this been tested? is it ready for release? are patches available
> >> to include auth_connect() calls? is it possible to disable the separte
> >> authentication (such a waste to connect twice to the same database)?
> >> * QUOTA imap extension
> >>    has testing been performed? does it work correcly with the internal
> >> dbmail quotum system? does it consider
> >> removed-but-not-yet-purged-in-maintenance messages (i.e. messages with
> >> status < 2 should not count for the mailboxsize)? i will remove the
> >> QUOTA keyword from the CAPABILITY string in case of any doubt..
> >>
> >> i know, these are a lot of questions and probably i could find some
> >> answers myself but we are real busy now :-( (but then again, life
> >> can't
> >> always be as fun as dbmail coding - sometimes you just have to make
> >> money :p)
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Met vriendelijke groet,
> >>
> >>
> >> Roel Rozendaal
> >>
> >>
> >> _________________________
> >> R.A. Rozendaal
> >> ICT Manager
> >> IC&S
> >> T: +31 30 2322878
> >> F: +31 30 2322305
> >> www.ic-s.nl
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Dbmail mailing list
> >> Dbmail@dbmail.org
> >> https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
> >>
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
> >
> > iD8DBQE+P+xcflzKmtpiQEMRAg9DAJwIIj7C3+zArDfYGxeEnzLGTOAv2QCgiM0R
> > Ggbujn4m5l6fV6hVLs+qJgg=
> > =gv3o
> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > _______________________________________________
> > Dbmail mailing list
> > Dbmail@dbmail.org
> > https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
> >
> Met vriendelijke groet,
>
>
> Roel Rozendaal
>
>
> _________________________
> R.A. Rozendaal
> ICT Manager
> IC&S
> T: +31 30 2322878
> F: +31 30 2322305
> www.ic-s.nl
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dbmail mailing list
> Dbmail@dbmail.org
> https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
>

Reply via email to