well that would seem sensible from a pure version-number point of view
but the current cvs has no real new developments other than separate
authentication and QUOTA support. So this 1.1 release is more like a
1.0a bugfix release or however you would like to call it :-).
Our goal for the moment is to release (on _real_ short notice) a dbmail
version that is (1) compiles at once and (2) has working POP and IMAP
daemons. I prefer (by far) not yet implementing LDAP-authentication and
QUOTA for a stable release. As said before on this list, the
segfaulting pop daemon and compile-time errors are show-stoppers and we
really hate it that people get disappointed about dbmail because of
this..
Ben Kochie heeft op dinsdag, 4 feb 2003 om 17:37 (Europe/Amsterdam) het
volgende geschreven:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
wouldn't it be better to release CVS current as 1.1rc1, and let us test
it. this way we don't run into the silly things that happened to 1.0
:)
- -ben
"Unix is user friendly, Its just picky about its friends."
On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, Roel Rozendaal - IC&S wrote:
Hi all,
from our point of view, dbmail 1.1 is needed as soon as possible since
the 1.0 release does not compile straight away and suffers from severe
pop-bugs. These problems seem to be solved now; we are planning to
release the current CVS as dbmail 1.1 next thursday. I would ask you
all for patches are available but have not yet been included in cvs.
Some key points from the top of my head:
* automake
anyone has some working automake/autoconf patches for current CVS?
* separate authentication (LDAP)
has this been tested? is it ready for release? are patches available
to include auth_connect() calls? is it possible to disable the separte
authentication (such a waste to connect twice to the same database)?
* QUOTA imap extension
has testing been performed? does it work correcly with the internal
dbmail quotum system? does it consider
removed-but-not-yet-purged-in-maintenance messages (i.e. messages with
status < 2 should not count for the mailboxsize)? i will remove the
QUOTA keyword from the CAPABILITY string in case of any doubt..
i know, these are a lot of questions and probably i could find some
answers myself but we are real busy now :-( (but then again, life
can't
always be as fun as dbmail coding - sometimes you just have to make
money :p)
Met vriendelijke groet,
Roel Rozendaal
_________________________
R.A. Rozendaal
ICT Manager
IC&S
T: +31 30 2322878
F: +31 30 2322305
www.ic-s.nl
_______________________________________________
Dbmail mailing list
Dbmail@dbmail.org
https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+P+xcflzKmtpiQEMRAg9DAJwIIj7C3+zArDfYGxeEnzLGTOAv2QCgiM0R
Ggbujn4m5l6fV6hVLs+qJgg=
=gv3o
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Dbmail mailing list
Dbmail@dbmail.org
https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
Met vriendelijke groet,
Roel Rozendaal
_________________________
R.A. Rozendaal
ICT Manager
IC&S
T: +31 30 2322878
F: +31 30 2322305
www.ic-s.nl
