Hi all, Congrats to version 2.0.1.
Would you maybe be interested in an alternative approach to the Markesteijn x-trans demosaicing? I see that for Bayer patterns you have a fast one, plus two different high-quality ones (AMaZE and VNG4). The only high-quality one for x-trans seems to be Markesteijn. I personally find that Markesteijn is producing very sharp results, but also quite some false colour artifacts. I’ve been playing around with an alternative approach, and I’m slowly starting to get reasonable results. (even images with lots of green - always problematic - start looking okay(ish)). If you want to have a look: https://github.com/ILiebhardt/xtrans <https://github.com/ILiebhardt/xtrans> And some sample comparisons to Markesteijn, plus a brief explanation of the idea: https://www.storehouse.co/stories/b8sj2 <https://www.storehouse.co/stories/b8sj2> Don’t be mistaken by my version number: there’s still a lot of work to be done, and I also still have quite some ideas for improvements… So at this stage I just want to carefully pre-inquire if there could be some interest, in principle. Thanks a lot for letting me know. Cheers, Ingo ___________________________________________________________________________ darktable developer mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
