> > > > I figured it out !!!!!! > > > > > > > > if we have AI that fails worse and worse > > > > and we have an AI-driven compiler that is _intended_ to prevent the > > > > user from making any working code > > > > and we're _also_ okay with having a powerful compiler that succeeds > > > > and we're _also_ okay with having a stupid compiler that tries to mess > > > > with the user by making half-working messy code that makeds everything > > > > impossible (basically a form of a failing compiler) > > > > > > > > then allw e have to do is put the crippled AI in front of a compiler > > > > interface > > > > > > > > and we have an awesome compiler intended to fight with the user as a > > > > joke or processing experience!!! > > > > > > it makes sense to me >( maybe not enough of for today. > > > > > > what would the compiler interface look like? > > > > > > maybe it could accept any source code, and it would convert the source > > > code into words, and then convert the words into further source code, > > > and then compile the source code ???? > > > > > > hrrrrm > > > > > > so basically the compiler's job is to prevent the user from making a > > > computer program ... > > > > but users get tired easy :/ how do we keep it struggling? > > ok how about this: if the AI is failing worse and worse (soemtimes > happens, likely not always, but could) > then that could be part of the struggling to make things fail > > what if... the worse it was, this was counted as a success ... in some manner > ?
it's a little confusing >( but what if it's like "user, give me a challenging task." > "ummm how about enumerating successful algorithms for calculating a square > root, using a graph-based datastructure somewhere, in a single sourcefile of > less than a thousand lines?" "ok let me write a test for that" (writes test for something else that doesn't really work) "arright here i go! i'll try to make my test pass worse and worse!" > "don't forget metrics for sourcelines, graph-basedness, style, compilation > success .. unsure if that's quite right
