karl3@writeme.com wrote:
> karl3@writeme.com wrote:
> > <! ^(@/
> > machine learning marketer: "i'm not sure if the term "slave boss" is really 
> > ideal for you ..."
> > slave boss: "ah, yes, the social programs i've paid you to instigate are 
> > working already! yes. nobody says "slave boss". when they say that i kill 
> > them."
> > machine learning marketer looks at slave boss
> > o_@! ?
> > karl3@writeme.com wrote:
> > the quote levels don't work quite right in this hyperkitty 1.3.12 mailman 
> > interface.
> > i have an even better idea than an n-dimensional maze solving algorithm in 
> > 4 or so lines! [ ...
> > it's an old idea -- let's figure out a way to have _partial dimensions_! 
> > fuzzy dimensionality! vagueness, uncertainty, tangled wrong-like parts!
> > what would a maze-solving algorithm look like in a sloppy mix between 2+1/4 
> > and 2+1/3 dimensions? maybe a rough bell curve distribution centered aroudn 
> > 2+7/24ths dimensions?
> > what would the maze representation itself look like? there are so many 
> > different possible approaches!
> > --
> > attempting to send the above email gave the web2 interface error 
> > "undefined". i'm waiting a bit and checking the archives to see if it went 
> > through quickly. 719p et.
> > 720p not seeing it. sending again
> > feeling out how this lands (yes i suppose we could have only some avenues 
> > that reach into higher dimensionality, and even make the dimensionalitiness 
> > arbitrarily and infinitely high but use it in a distribution that provides 
> > for finite time (somewhat interesting!) but)

found a debateish over here, this doesn't seem quite right to some. if there 
are infinite dimensions, how can it possibly be in finite time? but of course i 
meant finitely-dimensioned hyperplanes in infinite nominal dimensions, which 
isn't nearly as fancy but sounds so exotic and esoteric that it's hard to 
differentiate

> i think maybe i'd like of course to expand the idea of a maze into the space 
> in which it is represented and held, kind of. how could the dimensionality 
> and path-connectivity-meaning of the maze, itself be maze-like?

Reply via email to