karl3@writeme.com wrote:
> > <! ^(@/
> > machine learning marketer: "i'm not sure if the term "slave boss" is really 
> > ideal for you ..."
> > slave boss: "ah, yes, the social programs i've paid you to instigate are 
> > working already! yes. nobody says "slave boss". when they say that i kill 
> > them."
> > machine learning marketer looks at slave boss
> > o_@! ?
> > karl3@writeme.com wrote:
> the quote levels don't work quite right in this hyperkitty 1.3.12 mailman 
> interface.
> > i have an even better idea than an n-dimensional maze solving algorithm in 
> > 4 or so lines! [ ...
> > it's an old idea -- let's figure out a way to have _partial dimensions_! 
> > fuzzy dimensionality! vagueness, uncertainty, tangled wrong-like parts!
> 
> what would a maze-solving algorithm look like in a sloppy mix between 2+1/4 
> and 2+1/3 dimensions? maybe a rough bell curve distribution centered aroudn 
> 2+7/24ths dimensions?
> 
> what would the maze representation itself look like? there are so many 
> different possible approaches!
> 
> --
> attempting to send the above email gave the web2 interface error "undefined". 
> i'm waiting a bit and checking the archives to see if it went through 
> quickly. 719p et.
> 
> 720p not seeing it. sending again

feeling out how this lands (yes i suppose we could have only some avenues that 
reach into higher dimensionality, and even make the dimensionalitiness 
arbitrarily and infinitely high but use it in a distribution that provides for 
finite time (somewhat interesting!) but)
i think maybe i'd like of course to expand the idea of a maze into the space in 
which it is represented and held, kind of. how could the dimensionality and 
path-connectivity-meaning of the maze, itself be maze-like?

Reply via email to