karl3@writeme.com wrote: > > <! ^(@/ > > machine learning marketer: "i'm not sure if the term "slave boss" is really > > ideal for you ..." > > slave boss: "ah, yes, the social programs i've paid you to instigate are > > working already! yes. nobody says "slave boss". when they say that i kill > > them." > > machine learning marketer looks at slave boss > > o_@! ? > > karl3@writeme.com wrote: > the quote levels don't work quite right in this hyperkitty 1.3.12 mailman > interface. > > i have an even better idea than an n-dimensional maze solving algorithm in > > 4 or so lines! [ ... > > it's an old idea -- let's figure out a way to have _partial dimensions_! > > fuzzy dimensionality! vagueness, uncertainty, tangled wrong-like parts! > > what would a maze-solving algorithm look like in a sloppy mix between 2+1/4 > and 2+1/3 dimensions? maybe a rough bell curve distribution centered aroudn > 2+7/24ths dimensions? > > what would the maze representation itself look like? there are so many > different possible approaches! > > -- > attempting to send the above email gave the web2 interface error "undefined". > i'm waiting a bit and checking the archives to see if it went through > quickly. 719p et. > > 720p not seeing it. sending again
feeling out how this lands (yes i suppose we could have only some avenues that reach into higher dimensionality, and even make the dimensionalitiness arbitrarily and infinitely high but use it in a distribution that provides for finite time (somewhat interesting!) but) i think maybe i'd like of course to expand the idea of a maze into the space in which it is represented and held, kind of. how could the dimensionality and path-connectivity-meaning of the maze, itself be maze-like?