Fergus wrote: > Christopher Faylor wrote: > >> For the future: there's no need to bzip the attachment. >> That makes it harder to read. > > I just attached cygcheck.srv.out to the immediately preceding post and
No you didn't! > [additionally] it has appeared en clair in the text. No it hasn't![*] > Apologies! Last > time I did this I got a raft of annoyed responses for clogging people's > inboxes. What am I doing wrong in creating the attachment? Thunderbird does not automatically bzip attachments, and even if it did, it wouldn't have removed the ".srv" from the filename. It does, however, have an option under "View->Display Attachements Inline" that displays plain-text attachments "en clair". What you are doing wrong is looking at your later post: Date: Tue, 05 May 2009 07:22:34 +0100 Message-ID: <49ffdb2a.2060...@bonhard.uklinux.net> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2009-05/msg00133.html rather than the one CGF's reply: Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 01:04:22 -0400 Message-ID: <20090504050422.ga4...@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> In-Reply-To: <49fe746e.2080...@bonhard.uklinux.net> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2009-05/msg00075.html was actually addressing: Date: Mon, 04 May 2009 05:51:58 +0100 Message-ID: <49fe746e.2080...@bonhard.uklinux.net> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2009-05/msg00074.html which, seeing as it happened later in time, CGF's post could not reasonably have been expected to be responding to! PROTIP: "View->Sort by->Threaded" will help avoid this problem in future! cheers, DaveK -- [*] - An argument is a connected series of statements intended to establish a proposition! You're just contradicting everything I say![**] [**] - No I'm not! -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
