>>Just noticed that after the recent unison upgrade there exists a file >> /usr/bin/unison >>Also just noticed (but this must have occurred a while ago - 30/03/09 >>maybe, the date of a TeX upgrade?) that there now exists a directory >> /usr/lib/texmf/ >>with deep non-empty subdirectory structure. Is it the case for [1.7] >>that both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ should be empty as for [1.5]? >> >>Possibly the texmf/ packaging issue has been corrected in subsequent >>upgrades and so /usr/lib/texmf/ can be deleted without compromising >>functionality; but I think the appearance of /usr/bin/unison is very >>new.
>How about humoring our need for details by providing cygcheck output >as mentioned at http://cygwin.com/problems.html ? Sorry. Attached. Fergus
cygcheck.out.bz2
Description: Binary data
-- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
