On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 05:51:58AM +0100, Fergus wrote: > >>Just noticed that after the recent unison upgrade there exists a file > >> /usr/bin/unison > >>Also just noticed (but this must have occurred a while ago - 30/03/09 > >>maybe, the date of a TeX upgrade?) that there now exists a directory > >> /usr/lib/texmf/ > >>with deep non-empty subdirectory structure. Is it the case for [1.7] > >>that both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ should be empty as for [1.5]? > >> > >>Possibly the texmf/ packaging issue has been corrected in subsequent > >>upgrades and so /usr/lib/texmf/ can be deleted without compromising > >>functionality; but I think the appearance of /usr/bin/unison is very > >>new. > > >How about humoring our need for details by providing cygcheck output > >as mentioned at http://cygwin.com/problems.html ? > > Sorry. Attached.
For the future: there's no need to bzip the attachment. That makes it harder to read. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
