On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 09:44:27PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote: >Christopher Faylor wrote: >> On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 03:09:04PM -0400, Andrew Schulman wrote: >>>> I know they are downloaded from different directories release/ and >>>> release-2/ and installed into different versions of Cygwin [1.5] and [1.7] >>>> but up to now different package versions have always had different version >>>> numbers. >>>> With the most recent update of unison this convention has been broken: > >>>> If the "convention" identified above is real and intended (which I hope it >>>> is) please could the version numbering for this latest installation of >>>> unison be corrected to adhere to it? >>> Fergus, you're right. Sorry, I forgot about that. Friggin PITA, packaging >>> for 1.5 and 1.7... >> >> Doh. I forgot too. I should have noticed this when I uploaded. > >I must be feeling a little "special" today. Why should there be any >relationship between 1.5 package numbers and 1.7 package numbers?
I think we decided in cygwin-apps that cygwin packages should be numbered differently between 1.5 and 1.7 just for clarity since the namespace isn't reflected in the package name. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
