Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 03:09:04PM -0400, Andrew Schulman wrote:
>>> I know they are downloaded from different directories release/ and
>>> release-2/ and installed into different versions of Cygwin [1.5] and [1.7]
>>> but up to now different package versions have always had different version
>>> numbers.
>>> With the most recent update of unison this convention has been broken:
>>> If the "convention" identified above is real and intended (which I hope it
>>> is) please could the version numbering for this latest installation of
>>> unison be corrected to adhere to it?
>> Fergus, you're right. Sorry, I forgot about that. Friggin PITA, packaging
>> for 1.5 and 1.7...
>
> Doh. I forgot too. I should have noticed this when I uploaded.
I must be feeling a little "special" today. Why should there be any
relationship between 1.5 package numbers and 1.7 package numbers?
cheers,
DaveK
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
