The command 'type dos2unix' gives the following result : dos2unix is /usr/bin/dos2unix There is also a dos2unix in /bin. It seems that there are identical (at least same name and same size).
Thanks for your help. -----Message d'origine----- De : Eric Blake [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : jeudi 11 septembre 2008 03:03 À : cygwin@cygwin.com; Heude Pascal (LTS) Objet : Re: Help on dos2unix -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Please don't top-post: http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#TOFU > -----Message d'origine----- > De : cygwin-owner AT cygwin.com ^^^^ And please don't feed the spammers: http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PCYMTNQREAIYR According to Heude Pascal (LTS) on 9/10/2008 7:39 AM: > Yes, it is the cygwin version of dos2unix. And I also use the cygwin version > of make. But I am not running a bash but a pdksh. > The command I launch is : "dos2unix l82023aa.x" > If I look to the return code using the command "echo $?", I got 128. 128 is generally for application not found. In other words, dos2unix was probably not found in your current PATH settings. What does 'which dos2unix' or 'type dos2unix' say? How about 'ls /bin/dos2unix'? - -- Don't work too hard, make some time for fun as well! Eric Blake [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin) Comment: Public key at home.comcast.net/~ericblake/eblake.gpg Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkjIbk4ACgkQ84KuGfSFAYA2iACcC5Us0brvehaM773Qc5uTKuDo kjcAoJjjbSJcnjnMnCzAZoHJ81LAy3ax =jJLq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
