On Jun 6 02:42, Brian Dessent wrote: > Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > Mmm, because for a blind person this is a very basic package? > > Perhaps, but that doesn't mean that most Cygwin users are blind.
Perhaps, but that doesn't mean that an accessibility package doesn't make sense in the Base category. It *might* be better to put it into Utils, but YMMV depending on your eyesight. Looking into the package again, I noticed two problems, though: - There's an executable xbrlapi.exe in the package which depends on X. This is not noted in setup.hint. However, No package in the Base category should depend on X, so that X isn't pulled in by default. Samuel, can you re-package brltty so that it comes in two packages, one brltty package which could be in Base or Utils, and another package called xbrlapi which is in X11 and Utils? - cygbrlapi-0.5.dll depends on WS2_32.DLL. Why? Shouldn't the package use Cygwin's socket functions? Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
