On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 12:26:54PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >On Jun 6 02:42, Brian Dessent wrote: >> Samuel Thibault wrote: >> >> > Mmm, because for a blind person this is a very basic package? >> >> Perhaps, but that doesn't mean that most Cygwin users are blind. > >Perhaps, but that doesn't mean that an accessibility package doesn't >make sense in the Base category. It *might* be better to put it into >Utils, but YMMV depending on your eyesight.
With all due respect to blind people, I don't think that we should be putting things in the Base category without consensus. Hopefully other people haven't been doing this either. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
