Bengt-Arne Fjellner wrote:
> either /proc/prtitions has something wrong or i have.
> This is how it looks.
> $ cat /proc/partitions
> major minor #blocks name
>
> 8 0 19535040 sda OK
> 8 16 78124095 sdb OK
> 8 17 56196 sdb1 OK
> 8 18 61978770 sdb2 OK
> 8 19 514080 sdb3 OK
> 8 20 15575017 sdb4 extended no name??
> 8 21 14546826 sdb5 found as sdb4
> 8 22 1020127 sdb6 extended no name??
> 8 25 1020096 sdb9 found as sdb5
> 8 32 120624052 sdc OK
> 8 33 120624021 sdc1 OK
> 8 48 58613152 sdd OK
> 8 49 58613121 sdd1 OK
> 8 65 253984 sde1 extended no name??
> 8 69 2062305 sde5 found as sde1
>
>
> I dont think that the extended partitions should have a device??
> and i find the other partitions as i have stated.
Thanks for the bug report. I will look into this when I get the time.
Incidentally, do you know what Linux's behaviour is in this regard, i.e.
if you run the same command on Linux (if you have it installed), what is
the result?
Chris
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
