Corinna Vinschen skrev:
> On Jun 21 09:14, Chris January wrote:
>> Bengt-Arne Fjellner wrote:
>>
>> > either /proc/prtitions has something wrong or i have.
>> > This is how it looks.
>> > $ cat /proc/partitions
>> > major minor #blocks name
>> >
>> > 8 0 19535040 sda OK
>> > 8 16 78124095 sdb OK
>> > 8 17 56196 sdb1 OK
>> > 8 18 61978770 sdb2 OK
>> > 8 19 514080 sdb3 OK
>> > 8 20 15575017 sdb4 extended no name??
>> > 8 21 14546826 sdb5 found as sdb4
>> > 8 22 1020127 sdb6 extended no name??
>> > 8 25 1020096 sdb9 found as sdb5
>> > 8 32 120624052 sdc OK
>> > 8 33 120624021 sdc1 OK
>> > 8 48 58613152 sdd OK
>> > 8 49 58613121 sdd1 OK
>> > 8 65 253984 sde1 extended no name??
>> > 8 69 2062305 sde5 found as sde1
>> >
>> >
>> > I dont think that the extended partitions should have a device??
>> > and i find the other partitions as i have stated.
>>
>>
>> Thanks for the bug report. I will look into this when I get the time.
>> Incidentally, do you know what Linux's behaviour is in this regard, i.e.
>> if you run the same command on Linux (if you have it installed), what is
>> the result?
>
> This should be solved in CVS. I've applied a patch yesterday.
>
Works with 2005-Jun-21 snapshot.
$ cat /proc/partitions
major minor #blocks name
8 0 19535040 sda
8 16 78124095 sdb
8 17 56196 sdb1
8 18 61978770 sdb2
8 19 514080 sdb3
8 20 14546826 sdb4
8 21 1020096 sdb5
8 32 120624052 sdc
8 33 120624021 sdc1
8 48 58613152 sdd
8 49 58613121 sdd1
8 64 506047 sde
8 65 507632 sde1
All OK. Thanks.
--
Bengt-Arne Fjellner
0910-58 53 69
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
