On Jun 21 09:14, Chris January wrote: > Bengt-Arne Fjellner wrote: > > > either /proc/prtitions has something wrong or i have. > > This is how it looks. > > $ cat /proc/partitions > > major minor #blocks name > > > > 8 0 19535040 sda OK > > 8 16 78124095 sdb OK > > 8 17 56196 sdb1 OK > > 8 18 61978770 sdb2 OK > > 8 19 514080 sdb3 OK > > 8 20 15575017 sdb4 extended no name?? > > 8 21 14546826 sdb5 found as sdb4 > > 8 22 1020127 sdb6 extended no name?? > > 8 25 1020096 sdb9 found as sdb5 > > 8 32 120624052 sdc OK > > 8 33 120624021 sdc1 OK > > 8 48 58613152 sdd OK > > 8 49 58613121 sdd1 OK > > 8 65 253984 sde1 extended no name?? > > 8 69 2062305 sde5 found as sde1 > > > > > > I dont think that the extended partitions should have a device?? > > and i find the other partitions as i have stated. > > > Thanks for the bug report. I will look into this when I get the time. > Incidentally, do you know what Linux's behaviour is in this regard, i.e. > if you run the same command on Linux (if you have it installed), what is > the result?
This should be solved in CVS. I've applied a patch yesterday. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com Red Hat, Inc. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
