Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > As I am sure you know, mentioning the GPL always starts a Rube > Goldberg reaction of interpretation from would-be lawyers, zealots, > or people who are unsatisfied with following the rules and assume > they should have more rights to the software than the owners of the > software intend to provide.
Good point. If only everybody had the same charming personality as you, we would not have such problems. What a shame! Maybe someday... Personally, I always follow the rules. I just think it is idiotic to enforce them on some poor academic distributing unmodified binaries whose source is widely available. On the other hand, if some corporation is making money distributing GPL'd code without source, they should clearly be nailed to the wall. Here's wishing the best to Red Hat's lawyers. - Pat "YANALATEYHSMBSI" LoPresti -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
