At 11:15 AM 4/14/2004, you wrote: >On Wednesday, April 14, 2004, at 04:25PM, Larry Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
<http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PCYMTNQREAIYR> >[snip] > >>>Most of my co-workers already switched to using bash, since there never >>>was an issue with it. Now I could do that too but I love zsh. ;) >>> >>>Anyone else experiencing this? Comments? Ideas? Shrieking epitaphs? >> >> >>Sure. There have been some problems over time. Check the email archives >>if you're interested in details. > >Actually I did check the archives whenever I had issues with zsh/cygwin >in the past. > Good. Thanks. >>I have a sneaking suspicion that you began this thread for a reason but >>I'm not going to jump to any conclusions (or 'take the bait' ;-) ) > >It's definitely not meant as a flame or anything like that. If it >sounded that way, I'm sorry. > >I realize the initial post was vague, but that was intentional. >I don't want to discuss the _current_ issue with zsh/cygwin, (if it >still exists like about 1month ago) but was more wondering how fellow >zsh/cygwin users feel about the situation and how they usually >handle the problems. (like maybe they use zsh for 'regular work' but >have a lil wrapper for 'make' which starts it in a bash or something >like that) The best way to handle problems is to report them in as much detail as possible and/or work to resolve them (patch/test/debug). The ways that you mention above to handle the problems are "work-arounds". If possible, it's best to avoid this situation and just fix the problems instead. Hopefully, that makes everyone feel happy. ;-) -- Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office 838 Washington Street (508) 893-9889 - FAX Holliston, MA 01746 -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
