On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 12:28:05AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: >On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 08:42:49PM -0400, Jason Tishler wrote: >>On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 03:01:27PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>> If the only concern is that cygcheck takes a long time, now, then, >>> like I said, that is something that can be rectified. >> >>Yes, the above is my real concern. > >I just hacked cygcheck to avoid calling gzip and use a mingw libz.a >(courtesy of Chuck Wilson) and it takes 26 seconds to complete on my >dual PIII 733MHZ WinXP system. I have most packages installed. > >Is that still too slow?
I should add that the previous version took 1 minute, 9 seconds. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
