On Fri, 5 Sep 2003, Jason Tishler wrote: > Igor, > > Would you be willing to make the status check portion of cygcheck -c > optional (i.e., another option)? The latest version is very expensive: > > $ # 1.5.3 on P4 2.4 GHz > $ time cygcheck -c >/dev/null > > real 1m49.646s > user 0m0.010s > sys 0m0.020s > > $ # 1.3.22 on P3 500 MHz > $ time cygcheck -c >/dev/null > > real 0m0.042s > user 0m0.010s > sys 0m0.020s > > Thanks, > Jason
Jason, What CGF said. I assume since cygcheck can also be used to find out the version of one installed package at a time, it might be a good idea to add another flag. However, I'd suggest restructuring the flags while we're at it, i.e., only print package info if "-c" is specified (just like registry info is only printed if "-r" is set). Add a "-e" option that prints environment; "-n" that checks security stuff (runs "id", checks /etc/passwd and /etc/group, and so on), and "-i" that checks package integrity (only valid with "-c"). Then the "-s" flag will only print the versions of DLLs and the programs found (and the mounts). Problem reports will then have to include the output of "cygcheck -scnver", but, IMO, this is worth the fine-grained control over what's printed by cygcheck. Opinions? Igor -- http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/ |\ _,,,---,,_ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ [EMAIL PROTECTED] |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' Igor Pechtchanski, Ph.D. '---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow! "I have since come to realize that being between your mentor and his route to the bathroom is a major career booster." -- Patrick Naughton -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/