Date sent: Fri, 5 Sep 2003 11:07:29 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: latest cygcheck -c is expensive Send reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 08:40:47AM -0400, Jason Tishler wrote: > >Would you be willing to make the status check portion of cygcheck -c > >optional (i.e., another option)? The latest version is very expensive: > > > > $ # 1.5.3 on P4 2.4 GHz > > $ time cygcheck -c >/dev/null > > > > real 1m49.646s > > user 0m0.010s > > sys 0m0.020s > > > > $ # 1.3.22 on P3 500 MHz > > $ time cygcheck -c >/dev/null > > > > real 0m0.042s > > user 0m0.010s > > sys 0m0.020s > > Why does it matter if cygcheck -c is expensive? It is supposed to be doing > a sanity check on the installation. > > OTOH, it could probably be speeded up considerably if it used a mingw zlib > library... > > cgf > > -- > Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple > Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html > Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html > FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ > -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
