On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 05:13:39PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote: >Christopher Faylor wrote: >>I can say that any DLL built with cygwin-1.7.0-51 - cygwin-1.7.0-56 is >>probably suspect. That's 2009-07-13 - 2009-08-13 . > >Argh, that's my fault isn't it? Sorry for not figuring out we should >have done this when we first fixed that bug and thanks for putting in >the debugging effort.
Yeah, it's your "fault". But, of course, you introduced a new mechanism to fix a very longstanding problem. Some kinks are to be expected. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
