On Feb 7 10:37, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 10:38:23AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >On Feb 7 01:13, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >> On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 09:53:48PM -0800, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote: > >> >Reentrancy isn't actually required, but no reason not to do it. I have > >> >compiled net.cc but not done any other testing. Did I mention that > >> >dup_ent is really neat? > >> > >> Thank you. That solved a few problems when I implemented it. > >> > >> You'd think it would have occurred to me that you could use it in this > >> context. > >> > >> This is fine with me, if it is ok with Corinna. > > > >I like it, but it's a bit over the border for a trivial patch. I'd be > >willing to let slip this through, though. Yitzchak, any plans to send > >a copyright assignment form to Red Hat? That would be nice and would > >keep me from further ticking off. ;-) > > > >However, CVS seems to be broken somehow. I can't check it in. Stay > >tuned. > > I wanted to find out what was wrong with CVS, so I just tried checking this > in. I had no problems fortunately (or unfortunately, depending on how you > look at it).
Weird. No it works again. When I tried it this morning, I got strange messages (which I neither saved nor recall unfortunately). I was unable to access you latest patches and I was unable to checkout a fresh copy of winsup. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader mailto:[email protected] Red Hat, Inc.
