On Feb 7 01:13, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 09:53:48PM -0800, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote: > >Reentrancy isn't actually required, but no reason not to do it. I have > >compiled net.cc but not done any other testing. Did I mention that > >dup_ent is really neat? > > Thank you. That solved a few problems when I implemented it. > > You'd think it would have occurred to me that you could use it in this > context. > > This is fine with me, if it is ok with Corinna.
I like it, but it's a bit over the border for a trivial patch. I'd be willing to let slip this through, though. Yitzchak, any plans to send a copyright assignment form to Red Hat? That would be nice and would keep me from further ticking off. ;-) However, CVS seems to be broken somehow. I can't check it in. Stay tuned. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader mailto:[email protected] Red Hat, Inc.
