On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 10:38:23AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >On Feb 7 01:13, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 09:53:48PM -0800, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote: >> >Reentrancy isn't actually required, but no reason not to do it. I have >> >compiled net.cc but not done any other testing. Did I mention that >> >dup_ent is really neat? >> >> Thank you. That solved a few problems when I implemented it. >> >> You'd think it would have occurred to me that you could use it in this >> context. >> >> This is fine with me, if it is ok with Corinna. > >I like it, but it's a bit over the border for a trivial patch. I'd be >willing to let slip this through, though. Yitzchak, any plans to send >a copyright assignment form to Red Hat? That would be nice and would >keep me from further ticking off. ;-) > >However, CVS seems to be broken somehow. I can't check it in. Stay >tuned.
I wanted to find out what was wrong with CVS, so I just tried checking this in. I had no problems fortunately (or unfortunately, depending on how you look at it). cgf
