Andrey Chernov wrote:
On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 10:33:49PM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
For ones who doubts there two tests compiled with -O2. As you may see the
result is almost identical (andl vs cmpl):
Q.E.D. How about to restore original, more reader-friendly version then?
1. Reader-friendly version generates long code when absolutely no
optimization used in compiler (for some reason f.e. to avoid optimization
bugs).
Code with "absolutely no optimization" is slow for many other reasons.
2. It also breaks common style ctype using for is{w}ascii(). If revert
this, is{w}ascii() should be rewritted too.
I think, the latter is a good suggestion.
Christoph
_______________________________________________
cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
