On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 10:33:49PM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > For ones who doubts there two tests compiled with -O2. As you may see the
> > result is almost identical (andl vs cmpl):
>
> Q.E.D. How about to restore original, more reader-friendly version then?
1. Reader-friendly version generates long code when absolutely no
optimization used in compiler (for some reason f.e. to avoid optimization
bugs).
2. It also breaks common style ctype using for is{w}ascii(). If revert
this, is{w}ascii() should be rewritted too.
--
http://ache.pp.ru/
_______________________________________________
cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
