Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 04:50:45PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
Yeah, looks a bit odd - I wonder why the revision number of that file
was suddently bumped from 1.28 to 2.0 by CVS...
There is no mystery. :) I bumped the version on all the files in the port
to match the new version 2.0 for portmaster itself. See the commit log for
more information on why.
That's not exactly "standard procedure", is it? I mean, no other ports
have a direct relation between their version and the revision of their
Makefile in FreeBSD ports?
Why would this be needed for portmaster?
Why do you care?
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
_______________________________________________
cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
