On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 03:34:12PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote: > Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 04:50:45PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote: >>> Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: >>> >>>> Yeah, looks a bit odd - I wonder why the revision number of that file >>>> was suddently bumped from 1.28 to 2.0 by CVS... >>> There is no mystery. :) I bumped the version on all the files in the port >>> to match the new version 2.0 for portmaster itself. See the commit log >>> for more information on why. >> >> That's not exactly "standard procedure", is it? I mean, no other ports >> have a direct relation between their version and the revision of their >> Makefile in FreeBSD ports? >> >> Why would this be needed for portmaster? > > Why do you care?
Well, you wrote that the commit log contained information on why you did this... Since this must be considered pretty non-standard (as far as I can tell, no other ports have this requirement), I'm quite curious as to why this was needed. Brix -- Henrik Brix Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
pgpcE7DcB5qIx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
