On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 04:50:45PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
> 
>> Yeah, looks a bit odd - I wonder why the revision number of that file
>> was suddently bumped from 1.28 to 2.0 by CVS...
> 
> There is no mystery. :) I bumped the version on all the files in the port 
> to match the new version 2.0 for portmaster itself. See the commit log for 
> more information on why.

That's not exactly "standard procedure", is it? I mean, no other ports
have a direct relation between their version and the revision of their
Makefile in FreeBSD ports?

Why would this be needed for portmaster? I couldn't seem to find any
explanation in your commit log?

Brix
-- 
Henrik Brix Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Attachment: pgpxarbhX6zBG.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to