On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 03:12:02PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote: > On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 02:21:38PM +0100, Wilko Bulte wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 12:01:50PM +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote.. > > > Ceri Davies p????e v po 07. 11. 2005 v 09:57 +0000: > > > > On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 10:07:38AM +0100, Simon L. Nielsen wrote: > > > > > On 2005.11.06 22:29:45 +0000, Ceri Davies wrote: > > > > > > ceri 2005-11-06 22:29:45 UTC > > > > > > > > > > > > FreeBSD doc repository > > > > > > > > > > > > Modified files: > > > > > > en/cgi Makefile query-pr.cgi > > > > > > Added files: > > > > > > en/cgi querypr-code.cgi > > > > > > Log: > > > > > > Don't show the email address of the Originator by default. > > > > > > There is a link provided whereby users can enter a code to > > > > > > see the email addresses. > > > > > > > > > > Are there any plans to plug the 10+ other places where we still > > > > > expose user email addresses? > > > > > > > > Nope. > > > > > > What is it good for, then? It will be major pain for me, as I used to > > > copy&paste that field into the commit logs... > > > > <sigh> We had a PR submitter moan about this, hence Ceri's change. > > No-one really believes this fixes the issue :-/ > > :-(( Since we know this change doesn't fix spammer's harvesting it would > be nice to revert to previous behavior. Like Pav, I also copy-n-paste > from this field when I commit PR fixes. So this only increases the > amount of effort to commit a PR related change.
I don't really care. I only implemented it because I naively thought doing that would take less time than having the discussion about not doing it :-/ If core@ would like to make the decision, the dude abides. Ceri -- Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former. -- Einstein (attrib.)
pgpW8ehSsIB2c.pgp
Description: PGP signature
