On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 05:46:13PM +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote: > Ceri Davies p??e v so 12. 11. 2005 v 14:11 +0000: > > On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 12:16:45PM +0100, Erwin Lansing wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 11:35:41PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: > > > > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > : > I tend to think that we should keep the fix in place. And then, as > > > > : > volunteer time permits, we can sanitize other vectors of > > > > : > spam-harvester information, as appropriate. > > > > : > > > > > : > Rather than hassling Ceri for not solving the whole problem, he > > > > should > > > > : > be praised for starting to do something about it and others should > > > > be > > > > : > encouraged to help. > > > > : > > > > > : > If you need to get the addresses for someone in the pr system, then > > > > if > > > > : > you can login to freefall, you can still do so. > > > > : > > > > : You probably don't need to do this much, but ports committers do, > > > > : since committing PRs is a large part of the workload of being a ports > > > > : committer (some committers probably do a hundred or more per week). > > > > > > > > And they are getting the PR via the web interface, complete with > > > > markup? > > > > > > > No, just add f=raw to get the raw PR without markup. > > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=<PR#>&f=raw > > > ^^^^^^ > > > > If you do that, then the address is in the PR header anyway, so where's > > the problem? (yes, that elides the usefulness a little, but raw links > > are not presented on the site and are therefore less spiderable). > > Yay, I so don't see "Raw PR" link on the bottom of the PR page... > Yeah, absolutely spider resistant.
Choose your own fucking insult. Ceri -- Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former. -- Einstein (attrib.)
pgpRxLl840hgQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
