On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 12:16:45PM +0100, Erwin Lansing wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 11:35:41PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >             Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > : > I tend to think that we should keep the fix in place.  And then, as
> > : > volunteer time permits, we can sanitize other vectors of
> > : > spam-harvester information, as appropriate.
> > : > 
> > : > Rather than hassling Ceri for not solving the whole problem, he should
> > : > be praised for starting to do something about it and others should be
> > : > encouraged to help.
> > : > 
> > : > If you need to get the addresses for someone in the pr system, then if
> > : > you can login to freefall, you can still do so.
> > : 
> > : You probably don't need to do this much, but ports committers do,
> > : since committing PRs is a large part of the workload of being a ports
> > : committer (some committers probably do a hundred or more per week).
> > 
> > And they are getting the PR via the web interface, complete with
> > markup?
> > 
> No, just add f=raw to get the raw PR without markup.
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=<PR#>&f=raw
>                                                 ^^^^^^

If you do that, then the address is in the PR header anyway, so where's
the problem? (yes, that elides the usefulness a little, but raw links
are not presented on the site and are therefore less spiderable).

Ceri
-- 
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm
not sure about the former.                        -- Einstein (attrib.)

Attachment: pgprRzc14ZO0l.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to