Hi Judd, Most of the larger organizations are using a red hat RHEL or RHEL derivative such as CentOS or SuSE, Oracle, Cern, etc. Where as Fedora is mostly for experimental code and not really suited for enterprise use.
For most customers considering the use of Crowbar I'd suggest CentOS over Fedora. Also - most Hadoop deployments I know of are using CentOS or RHEL as their base so that's another vote. Just my 2 cents. Cheers!!! Thanks for your efforts!. I b e n On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Judd Maltin <j...@newgoliath.com> wrote: > Hi folks, > > I put in a bunch of work last week on creating a functional CentOS Vagrant > box for Crowbar 2.0 development. I see that Mikey P has been working on > docs to setup a Fedora environment. Anyone have any strong feelings which > we should be using? I have a concern that Crowbar 2.0 will be deployed to > far more restrictive CentOS/RHEL environments, and developing on Fedora > might give a false sense of ample tools available on the deployment OS. :-) > > Thoughts? > > You can find my work on http://www.github.com/crowbar/crowbar-utils/ > > -judd > > -- > Judd Maltin > T: 917-882-1270 > F: 501-694-7809 > what could possibly go wrong? > > > > _______________________________________________ > Crowbar mailing list > Crowbar@dell.com > https://lists.us.dell.com/mailman/listinfo/crowbar > For more information: http://crowbar.github.com/ >
_______________________________________________ Crowbar mailing list Crowbar@dell.com https://lists.us.dell.com/mailman/listinfo/crowbar For more information: http://crowbar.github.com/
