Still need your help, friend
On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 11:15 AM Mike Banon <[email protected]> wrote: > > Although I found this article > https://www.coreboot.org/Creating_Valid_IRQ_Tables , I'm not sure if > it applies to mainboard_picr_data/_intr_data : considering a problem > from my previous msg - where a copy-paste of old picr/intr data > structures gave the bad results. Could you please clarify if this > article is still valid for these new data structures? If not, how to > get the correct values for mainboard_picr_data/_intr_data using Linux? > > > On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 6:23 PM Mike Banon <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Dear friends, I'm trying to properly program the IRQ tables for Lenovo > > G505S, because the old IRQ routing is bad and doesn't work for a > > simple OS like Kolibri. Full details are in the comments under this > > change: > > > > https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/46587/ > > > > When I used the old picr_data/intr_data values of G505S for the new > > structures, I got only 1 IRQ working. However, with a copy-paste of > > AM1I-A - surprisingly 12 IRQs and a laptop boots, but still some > > problems. Please advise how to compose mainboard_picr_data/_intr_data > > and also a intel_irq_routing_table, your help will be very much > > appreciated. > > > > Best regards, > > Mike Banon _______________________________________________ coreboot mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
