On Wed, 26 Nov 2025 11:34:11 GMT, Jatin Bhateja <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Add a new Float16lVector type and corresponding concrete vector classes, in >> addition to existing primitive vector types, maintaining operation parity >> with the FloatVector type. >> - Add necessary inline expander support. >> - Enable intrinsification for a few vector operations, namely >> ADD/SUB/MUL/DIV/MAX/MIN/FMA. >> - Use existing Float16 vector IR and backend support. >> - Extended the existing VectorAPI JTREG test suite for the newly added >> Float16Vector operations. >> >> The idea here is to first be at par with Float16 auto-vectorization support >> before intrinsifying new operations (conversions, reduction, etc). >> >> The following are the performance numbers for some of the selected >> Float16Vector benchmarking kernels compared to equivalent auto-vectorized >> Float16OperationsBenchmark kernels. >> >> <img width="1449" height="629" alt="image" >> src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b4474361-9886-4315-a614-f4073fd075b9"; >> /> >> >> Initial RFP[1] was floated on the panama-dev mailing list. >> >> Kindly review the draft PR and share your feedback. >> >> Best Regards, >> Jatin >> >> [1] https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/panama-dev/2025-August/021100.html > > Jatin Bhateja has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional > commit since the last revision: > > Cleanups src/hotspot/share/opto/vectorIntrinsics.cpp line 341: > 339: laneType == nullptr || !laneType->is_con() || > 340: vector_klass == nullptr || vector_klass->const_oop() == nullptr || > 341: laneType == nullptr || !laneType->is_con() || is this repeating the same condition on line 339? ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28002#discussion_r2592254926
