On Wed, 12 Nov 2025 19:48:54 GMT, Paul Sandoz <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > Some quick comments. > > > > We should be consistent in the naming, and rename `Halfloat*` to > > > > `Float16*`. > > > > > > > > > I concur, especially since there are multiple 16-bit floating-point > > > formats in use including the IEEE 754 float16 as well as bfloat16. > > > > > > There are nomenclature issues that I am facing. Currently, all the Float16 > > concrete classes use the Halffloat prefix i.e., Halffloat64Vector, > > Halffloat128Vector; converting these to Float16 looks a little confusing, > > i.e., Float1664Vector, Float16128Vector, etc Kindly suggest a better name > > to represent these classes. > > Maybe we move the shape to the end e.g., `Float16Vector128`, `IntVector128`, > `IntVectorMax`? This looks good, since all these are concrete vector classes not exposed to users. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28002#issuecomment-3526723445
