On Tue, 23 Sep 2025 05:09:24 GMT, David Holmes <[email protected]> wrote:

>> Implementation changes for [JEP 500: Prepare to Make Final Mean 
>> Final](https://openjdk.org/jeps/500).
>> 
>> Field.set (and Lookup.unreflectSetter) are changed to allow/warn/debug/deny 
>> when mutating a final instance field. JFR event recorded if final field 
>> mutated. Spec updates to Field.set, Field.setAccessible and Module.addOpens 
>> to align with the proposal in the JEP.
>> 
>> HotSpot is updated to add support for the new command line options. To aid 
>> diagnosability, -Xcheck:jni reports a fatal error when a mutating a final 
>> field with JNI, and -Xlog:jni=debug can help identity when JNI code mutates 
>> finals. For now, JNI code is allowed to set the "write-protected" fields 
>> System.in/out/err, we can re-visit once we change the 
>> System.setIn/setOut/setErr methods to not use JNI (I prefer to keep this 
>> separate to this PR because there is a small startup regression to address 
>> when changing System.setXXX).
>> 
>> There are many new tests. A small number of existing tests are changed to 
>> run /othervm as reflectively opening a package isn't sufficient. Changing 
>> the tests to /othervm means that jtreg will launch the agent with the 
>> command line options to open the package.
>> 
>> Testing: tier1-6
>
> src/hotspot/share/prims/jni.cpp line 1873:
> 
>> 1871:   if (log_is_enabled(Debug, jni)) {
>> 1872:     fieldDescriptor fd;
>> 1873:     bool found = 
>> InstanceKlass::cast(klass)->find_field_from_offset(offset, true, &fd);
> 
> If you are assuming/expecting an `InstanceKlass` then that should be the type 
> of the parameter. (The existing code needs a cleanup in this area too but 
> that is outside the scope of this PR.)

Okay, but it will mean a cast in the jni_SetXXField callers, I don't think we 
avoid that before more changes to the existing code.

> src/hotspot/share/prims/jniCheck.cpp line 1224:
> 
>> 1222: WRAPPER_GetField(jdouble,  Double,  T_DOUBLE)
>> 1223: 
>> 1224: static void checkCanSetInstanceField(JavaThread* thr, jfieldID fid, 
>> jobject obj) {
> 
> There is a lot of duplication here with logic already performed in 
> `checkInstanceFieldID` - can you not just pass an extra argument `is_set` to 
> that and include the new checks there? And similarly for the static case.

Given that checkInstanceFieldID and checkStaticFieldID already have a list of 
checks then adding it to these functions, rather than new functions, would be 
better, I'll do that.

> test/jdk/java/lang/reflect/Field/mutateFinals/jni/JNIAttachMutatorTest.java 
> line 29:
> 
>> 27:  * @summary Test native thread attaching to the VM with JNI 
>> AttachCurrentThread and directly
>> 28:  *    invoking Field.set to set a final field
>> 29:  * @requires (os.family == "linux" | os.family == "mac")
> 
> This test should work for any non-Windows platform using pthreads.

We can make it work on Windows too but means `#ifdef WIN32` and CreateThread in 
the test, easy to do, and means the `@requires` can do away.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25115#discussion_r2372772061
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25115#discussion_r2372771913
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25115#discussion_r2372773863

Reply via email to