On Fri, 29 Aug 2025 20:07:52 GMT, Erik Joelsson <er...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> Looking again, I'm now guessing that this was kept as a static generation > because it was expected to rarely change and someone thought it wasn't worth > the build time overhead of dynamically generating the class in every build. > Could that be the case? I think the reason we did not have a dynamic generator because area maintainers were not familiar with a custom Java-driven generator - the generator we had for VarHandle implementation classes was a make-based spp generator. I was only enlightened when I saw the core-libs addition of character generators recently. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27009#issuecomment-3238221125
