On Wed, 14 May 2025 15:44:08 GMT, Jiangli Zhou <jian...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Please review this PR for skipping >> jdk/test/lib/process/TestNativeProcessBuilder on static-jdk. Duplicating the >> context from https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8356904 description: >> >> jdk/test/lib/process/TestNativeProcessBuilder.java (in lib-test/tier1) uses >> a native test launcher executable, exejvm-test-launcher, which has >> explicitly dependency on libjvm.so. The test fails on static-jdk. This is >> the same issue as >> [JDK-8352276](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8352276). With >> [JDK-8352276](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8352276), we decided to >> skip the affected hotspot tier1 tests on static-jdk. We should skip >> jdk/test/lib/process/TestNativeProcessBuilder.java on static-jdk as well. >> [JDK-8352305](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8352305) will add tests >> using custom launcher executable on static JDK. > > Jiangli Zhou has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional > commit since the last revision: > > Update copyright year in > test/lib-test/jdk/test/lib/process/TestNativeProcessBuilder.java. Still need a (R)eviewer. @AlanBateman, @jerboaa, or @dholmes-ora Could one of you help review/approve? Thanks ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25220#issuecomment-2898711067
