On Thu, 27 Mar 2025 11:30:11 GMT, Alan Bateman <al...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> I'm breaking this change out as a separate improvement, since it will not be >> generally possible to adjust these limits on the j.u.c primitives since they >> might already use a backing `long` to pack in information which needs to be >> updated atomically (would require 128-bit atomics to widen them, and it >> still infeasible to change return types of pre-existing APIs). > > We'll need to double check serialization compatibility as the "sync" field is > in the serial form. @AlanBateman Good point. I'll see if I can try serializing an instance before the change and deserialize it after the change. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24261#issuecomment-2761642467
